Legend
Legend
MLB Bet Analyzer
Jun 12 · projections vs. lines
MLB Bet Analyzer
Jun 12 · projections vs. lines
Scout AI — Moneyline picks
Miami Marlins
MIA @ PIT · +120
6:40 PM EDT
Seattle Mariners
SEA @ WSH · -145
6:45 PM EDT
Baltimore Orioles
SD @ BAL · -140
7:05 PM EDT
Detroit Tigers
DET @ CLE · -110
7:10 PM EDT
Boston Red Sox
TEX @ BOS · -130
7:10 PM EDT
Arizona Diamondbacks
ARI @ CIN · -115
7:15 PM EDT
Atlanta Braves
ATL @ NYM · -110
7:15 PM EDT
Los Angeles Dodgers
LAD @ CWS · -140
7:40 PM EDT
Milwaukee Brewers
PHI @ MIL · -240
7:40 PM EDT
Houston Astros
HOU @ KC · -120
8:10 PM EDT
Minnesota Twins
STL @ MIN · -140
8:10 PM EDT
Tampa Bay Rays
TB @ LAA · -175
9:38 PM EDT
San Francisco Giants
CHC @ SF · -110
10:15 PM EDT
P&L settles as games go final
Cafecito — Runline picks
MIA +1.5
MIA @ PIT · -180
6:40 PM EDT
SEA -1.5
SEA @ WSH · +110
6:45 PM EDT
SD +1.5
SD @ BAL · -175
7:05 PM EDT
CLE +1.5
DET @ CLE · -185
7:10 PM EDT
BOS -1.5
TEX @ BOS · +160
7:10 PM EDT
ARI -1.5
ARI @ CIN · +140
7:15 PM EDT
ATL -1.5
ATL @ NYM · +155
7:15 PM EDT
LAD -1.5
LAD @ CWS · +115
7:40 PM EDT
PHI +1.5
PHI @ MIL · -115
7:40 PM EDT
KC +1.5
HOU @ KC · -165
8:10 PM EDT
STL +1.5
STL @ MIN · -185
8:10 PM EDT
LAA +1.5
TB @ LAA · -115
9:38 PM EDT
SF +1.5
CHC @ SF · -190
10:15 PM EDT
P&L settles as games go final
Scout Sonnet — Moneyline picks
Miami Marlins
MIA @ PIT · +120
6:40 PM EDT
Seattle Mariners
SEA @ WSH · -145
6:45 PM EDT
Baltimore Orioles
SD @ BAL · -140
7:05 PM EDT
Detroit Tigers
DET @ CLE · -110
7:10 PM EDT
Boston Red Sox
TEX @ BOS · -130
7:10 PM EDT
Arizona Diamondbacks
ARI @ CIN · -115
7:15 PM EDT
Atlanta Braves
ATL @ NYM · -110
7:15 PM EDT
Los Angeles Dodgers
LAD @ CWS · -140
7:40 PM EDT
Milwaukee Brewers
PHI @ MIL · -240
7:40 PM EDT
Houston Astros
HOU @ KC · -120
8:10 PM EDT
Minnesota Twins
STL @ MIN · -140
8:10 PM EDT
Tampa Bay Rays
TB @ LAA · -175
9:38 PM EDT
San Francisco Giants
CHC @ SF · -110
10:15 PM EDT
P&L settles as games go final
Sonnet + Scout AI — Consensus ML- (favs)
16-6 · +$801Seattle Mariners
SEA @ WSH · -145
6:45 PM EDT
Baltimore Orioles
SD @ BAL · -140
7:05 PM EDT
Detroit Tigers
DET @ CLE · -110
7:10 PM EDT
Boston Red Sox
TEX @ BOS · -130
7:10 PM EDT
Arizona Diamondbacks
ARI @ CIN · -115
7:15 PM EDT
Atlanta Braves
ATL @ NYM · -110
7:15 PM EDT
Los Angeles Dodgers
LAD @ CWS · -140
7:40 PM EDT
Milwaukee Brewers
PHI @ MIL · -240
7:40 PM EDT
Houston Astros
HOU @ KC · -120
8:10 PM EDT
Minnesota Twins
STL @ MIN · -140
8:10 PM EDT
Tampa Bay Rays
TB @ LAA · -175
9:38 PM EDT
San Francisco Giants
CHC @ SF · -110
10:15 PM EDT
P&L settles as games go final
Sonnet + Scout AI — Consensus ML+ (dogs)
3-3 · +$62Miami Marlins
MIA @ PIT · +120
6:40 PM EDT
P&L settles as games go final
Cafecito + Sonnet — Consensus +1.5 RL
19-8 · +$505MIA +1.5
MIA @ PIT
6:40 PM EDT
SD +1.5
SD @ BAL
7:05 PM EDT
CLE +1.5
DET @ CLE
7:10 PM EDT
KC +1.5
HOU @ KC
8:10 PM EDT
STL +1.5
STL @ MIN
8:10 PM EDT
LAA +1.5
TB @ LAA
9:38 PM EDT
SF +1.5
CHC @ SF
10:15 PM EDT
P&L settles as games go final
Cafecito + Scout AI — Consensus +1.5 RL
18-6 · +$777MIA +1.5
MIA @ PIT
6:40 PM EDT
STL +1.5
STL @ MIN
8:10 PM EDT
LAA +1.5
TB @ LAA
9:38 PM EDT
SF +1.5
CHC @ SF
10:15 PM EDT
P&L settles as games go final
Cafecito + Sonnet + Scout AI — Consensus +1.5 RL
16-5 · +$767MIA +1.5
MIA @ PIT
6:40 PM EDT
STL +1.5
STL @ MIN
8:10 PM EDT
LAA +1.5
TB @ LAA
9:38 PM EDT
SF +1.5
CHC @ SF
10:15 PM EDT
P&L settles as games go final
Alcantara shows strong recent form with back-to-back quality starts (1.29 and 3.86 ERA), while Ashcraft is regressing after a poor last outing (10.80 ERA on 6/6). Miami's offense has been inconsistent but showed life in recent games (6.7 R/G last 3), while Pittsburgh's offense remains solid but slightly cooled (4.7 R/G last 3). This matchup favors Miami's pitching advantage despite playing on the road.
Sandy Alcantara has been trending sharply upward (1 ER in last 7 IP) with elite 30-day metrics (xFIP 2.90, BB% 1.0%), while Braxton Ashcraft just got shelled for 6 ER in his last start despite strong underlying numbers. Miami is riding a 6-1 stretch in their last 7 games and their offense has exploded for 20 runs in the last 2 games, while Pittsburgh has cooled off (2-5 last 7, only 4.7 R/G in last 3). Both bullpens are somewhat taxed, with MIA's high-leverage arms all limited after pitching yesterday, though PIT's bullpen also has key arms limited.
MIA projects to score approximately 3.8-4.2 runs against Ashcraft (xFIP 2.44, elite p25 range, ~6.0 IP) then a PIT bullpen (avg xFIP 3.92, near league RA/9 4.37) with limited arms; Miami's offense is HOT (5.6 R/G last 5) but xwOBA 0.353 vs wOBA 0.342 suggests production is real and sustainable, though back-to-back fatigue and Ashcraft's elite xFIP cap upside. PIT projects to score approximately 2.8-3.2 runs against Alcantara (xFIP 2.90, strong p25 range, ~5.8 IP) then a MIA bullpen (avg xFIP 4.12, slightly below league); PIT's wOBA 0.347 vs xwOBA 0.310 flags a -0.037 luck gap (contact due to regress), momentum is COLD, and Alcantara's xFIP trend is improving (3.43->2.90). Combined estimate ~6.8-7.4 runs sits below the posted 8.5 total, though the total line moved from 8.0 to 8.5 with sharp money on the over despite 70% of tickets on under. The dominant baseball signal is two starters with elite xFIPs whose ERAs are inflated by bad luck, facing offenses with meaningful regressive or sustainable signals pulling in opposite directions.
| Date | Opp | IP | ERA | W/L |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6/7 | TBLOW | 7 | 1.29 | W |
| 6/1 | WSHELIT | 7 | 3.86 | W |
| 5/26 | TORLOW | 6 | 12.71 | L |
| 5/21 | ATLAVG | 6 | 9.00 | L |
| 5/16 | TBAVG | 6 | 0.00 | W |
| Date | Opp | IP | ERA | W/L |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6/6 | ATLHIGH | 5 | 10.80 | L |
| 5/31 | MINAVG | 6 | 3.00 | W |
| 5/26 | CHCPOOR | 6 | 1.42 | W |
| 5/21 | STLLOW | 7 | 1.29 | W |
| 5/15 | PHIAVG | 7 | 5.40 | L |
| vs RHP L10 | AVG3.97 | 4.1 R/G | 0.403 xwOBA |
| L10 overall | AVG4.10 | 4.7 R/G | 0.425 xwOBA |
| vs RHP L10 | AVG4.12 | 6.5 R/G | 0.446 xwOBA |
| L10 overall | AVG4.15 | 5.9 R/G | 0.427 xwOBA |
| Date | Starter | R | xwOBA |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6/11 | KellyRHPPOOR | 2 | 0.290 |
| 6/10 | NelsonRHPPOOR | 8 | 0.506 |
| 6/9 | GallenRHPBLW | 10 | 0.467 |
| 6/7 | JaxRHPACE | 4 | 0.388 |
| 6/6 | McClanahanLHPAVG | 4 | 0.444 |
| Date | Starter | R | xwOBA |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6/11 | WrobleskiLHPAVG | 6 | 0.431 |
| 6/10 | OhtaniRHPAVG | 9 | 0.483 |
| 6/9 | LauerLHPBLW | 3 | 0.399 |
| 6/7 | ElderRHPAVG | 2 | 0.321 |
| 6/6 | StriderRHPQAL | 3 | 0.352 |
Bryce Miller is in an elite stretch with three consecutive scoreless starts and elite peripherals (2.31 xFIP, 35.1 K%), while Zack Littell shows concerning regression indicators with a 4.45 xFIP and elevated hard-hit rate (40.0%). Seattle's offense has been inconsistent but faces a pitcher in decline, while Washington's recent form is mixed with a 3.7 R/G average in their last 3 games vs RHP.
Bryce Miller is in historically dominant form with three consecutive shutout outings and an elite 2.31 xFIP, 35.1% K rate, and 22.7% hard-hit rate over the last 30 days — he faces a Washington lineup that has cooled significantly (3.7 R/G in L3 vs RHP). Zack Littell is a significant step down in quality with a 4.45 xFIP and alarming 40.0% hard-hit rate, and he faces a Seattle lineup loaded with 6 LHB against his weak vs-LHB splits (xwOBA .342). The hot weather (+0.36 run impact) and fully rested bullpens add some late-game run potential, but Miller's dominance should suppress the total.
SEA projects to score approximately 3.8-4.2 runs facing Littell (xFIP 4.45, ~5.5 IP) and a below-average WSH bullpen (xFIP 4.69 vs league 4.37 RA/9), tempered by SEA's luck-driven wOBA/xwOBA gap (0.331 vs 0.310) and back-to-back fatigue. WSH projects to score approximately 1.8-2.2 runs facing Miller (xFIP 2.31, elite p25 tier, ~5.2 IP) with a strong SEA bullpen (xFIP 4.02), partially offset by WSH's wOBA/xwOBA reverse gap (0.298 vs 0.313, unlucky) and the 94F/wind-out environment (+0.4 runs shared). Combined estimate ~5.8-6.4 runs sits well under the posted 9.5 total, driven almost entirely by Miller's elite xFIP. Sharp money strongly favors SEA on both ML and runline, and the moneyline has held flat at -145, consistent with the market already pricing Miller's dominance.
| Date | Opp | IP | ERA | W/L |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6/6 | DETAVG | 6 | 0.00 | W |
| 5/31 | ARIELIT | 5 | 0.00 | W |
| 5/19 | CWSHIGH | 6 | 0.00 | L |
| 5/14 | HOULOW | 5 | 3.38 | L |
| Date | Opp | IP | ERA | W/L |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6/6 | ARILOW | 5 | 1.80 | W |
| 5/31 | SDPOOR | 6 | 3.00 | W |
| 5/20 | NYMELIT | 5 | 3.60 | W |
| 5/15 | BALAVG | 5 | 0.00 | W |
| 4/28 | NYMPOOR | 4 | 9.82 | L |
| vs RHP L10 | BLW4.59 | 4.1 R/G | 0.418 xwOBA |
| L10 overall | BLW4.61 | 4.2 R/G | 0.415 xwOBA |
| vs RHP L10 | BLW4.28 | 5.0 R/G | 0.408 xwOBA |
| L10 overall | AVG4.15 | 5.2 R/G | 0.422 xwOBA |
| Date | Starter | R | xwOBA |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6/11 | BradishRHPBLW | 5 | 0.388 |
| 6/10 | YoungRHPAVG | 2 | 0.323 |
| 6/9 | RogersLHPBLW | 6 | 0.444 |
| 6/8 | GibsonRHPPOOR | 6 | -- |
| 6/7 | FlahertyRHPACE | 4 | 0.549 |
| Date | Starter | R | xwOBA |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6/10 | RayLHPPOOR | 10 | 0.448 |
| 6/9 | HouserRHPBLW | 6 | 0.474 |
| 6/8 | WebbRHPAVG | 4 | -- |
| 6/7 | SorokaRHPQAL | 1 | 0.317 |
| 6/6 | RodriguezLHPQAL | 6 | 0.486 |
Baltimore's offense is significantly outperforming San Diego's, averaging 5.6 runs per game vs. the Padres' 3.0, with a notable edge in xwOBA (.367 vs .324). Shane Baz has been excellent in his last three starts with a 1.58 ERA, while Griffin Canning shows inconsistency and elevated hard-hit rates (52.3%), suggesting vulnerability against Baltimore's hot lineup.
Baltimore's offense has been scorching hot, averaging 5.6 runs over their last 10 games against a gauntlet of quality pitching (avg opp xFIP 3.35), while San Diego's offense has been ice cold at just 3.0 runs/game over the last 10. Griffin Canning has a concerning platoon split against LHB (wOBA 0.446) and Baltimore's lineup features 4 LHB, plus Canning's underlying metrics (xFIP 4.12, HardHit% 52.3) suggest regression risk. Shane Baz has been excellent in recent starts with a low HardHit% (42.1%) and Baltimore's bullpen is significantly depleted with only 4/8 arms rested and key relievers limited or unavailable.
BAL projects to score approximately 5.2–5.5 runs: their offense is legitimately hot (6.6 R/G last 10 vs RHP, xwOBA 0.481 confirms it's real, not luck), facing Canning who projects only ~4.3 IP (short workload hands 4.7 innings to a depleted SD bullpen with avg xFIP 3.52 — actually SD's pen is strong), wOBA 0.357/xwOBA 0.367 vs RHP confirming sustainable production. SD projects to score approximately 3.0–3.3 runs: averaging 3.2 R/G last 10 vs RHP (contact momentum COLD), facing Baz whose ERA 1.83 is massively deflated vs xFIP 4.39 (ERA-to-xFIP gap of -2.56 signals regression inbound), but Baz projects 6.2 IP deep into the game. Total projects ~8.3–8.8 runs against the 8.5 line, near-neutral with slight lean toward under given Baz's expected volume. Sharp money is heavily on BAL ML and home runline, and the over on totals.
| Date | Opp | IP | ERA | W/L |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6/6 | NYMLOW | 5 | 1.80 | W |
| 5/31 | WSHELIT | 5 | 5.40 | L |
| 5/25 | PHIAVG | 7 | 4.05 | L |
| 5/19 | LADHIGH | 5 | 5.40 | L |
| 5/14 | MILHIGH | 2 | 32.40 | L |
| Date | Opp | IP | ERA | W/L |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6/7 | TORAVG | 6 | 1.59 | L |
| 6/2 | BOSAVG | 7 | 2.57 | W |
| 5/26 | TBELIT | 7 | 1.29 | W |
| 5/20 | TBHIGH | 6 | 1.50 | L |
| 5/15 | WSHHIGH | 7 | 3.86 | L |
| vs RHP L10 | AVG4.04 | 3.2 R/G | 0.387 xwOBA |
| L10 overall | AVG3.91 | 3.0 R/G | 0.381 xwOBA |
| vs RHP L10 | QAL3.35 | 6.6 R/G | 0.481 xwOBA |
| L10 overall | QAL3.38 | 5.6 R/G | 0.459 xwOBA |
| Date | Starter | R | xwOBA |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6/10 | SingerRHPAVG | 5 | 0.342 |
| 6/9 | BurnsRHPACE | 3 | 0.339 |
| 6/8 | AbbottLHPBLW | 6 | -- |
| 6/7 | BrazobánRHPPOOR | 3 | 0.403 |
| 6/6 | McLeanRHPPOOR | 3 | 0.408 |
| Date | Starter | R | xwOBA |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6/11 | WooRHPQAL | 7 | 0.479 |
| 6/10 | KirbyRHPACE | 7 | 0.532 |
| 6/9 | GilbertRHPQAL | 5 | 0.427 |
| 6/8 | HancockRHPACE | 3 | -- |
| 6/7 | GausmanRHPACE | 4 | 0.432 |
Detroit's offense has been significantly more productive than Cleveland's, averaging 6.3 runs per game over the last 10 with strong recent form (8.3 R/G in last 3). Flaherty's elite 30-day xFIP of 2.57 with 29.7% K-rate gives Detroit a clear pitching advantage over Bibee's 4.43 xFIP, despite Bibee's recent dominant outing. This matchup heavily favors the Tigers.
Detroit enters as the road favorite despite a losing season record, riding strong recent offensive form (6.3 R/G last 10) and a Jack Flaherty who has a strong underlying xFIP (2.57) despite inconsistent ERA results. Cleveland's offense has cooled significantly (3.8 R/G last 10, 2.3 R/G last 3) and faces Flaherty's solid peripherals, while Tanner Bibee's xFIP (4.43) and concerning xwOBA vs LHB (0.422) suggest regression risk against a hot Detroit lineup that features 5 LHB. Cleveland's bullpen is fully rested and elite (3.25 xFIP) which provides a significant late-game advantage, but the offensive disparity and pitching matchup favor Detroit.
DET projects to score approximately 4.2-4.5 runs against Bibee (xFIP 4.43, p50 average, ~5.9 IP) and a strong CLE bullpen (xFIP 3.25, well below league RA/9 4.37); DET's offense is hot (6.0 R/G last 5) but contact is luck-driven (wOBA 0.400 vs xwOBA 0.353, -0.047 gap) warranting regression, and they're on a back-to-back. CLE projects to score approximately 2.8-3.2 runs against Flaherty (xFIP 2.57, elite near p25, ~5.1 IP) and a DET bullpen that is average-to-below (xFIP 4.29); CLE's offense has been cold (3.4 R/G last 5, L3: 2.3 R/G) against average pitching (opp xFIP 3.91), and Flaherty's xFIP trend is improving (3.30→2.57). Combined estimate ~7.2-7.7 runs vs posted line of 8.5, pointing toward the under. The market's sharp-money signal on the under (+31pp money vs bets) aligns with this read, and the ML line has moved sharply toward CLE (-110→-115) while DET moved from -110 to -2, confirming heavy market conviction on Cleveland.
| Date | Opp | IP | ERA | W/L |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6/7 | SEAAVG | 5 | 5.40 | W |
| 6/2 | TBHIGH | 5 | 0.00 | W |
| 5/28 | LAALOW | 6 | 4.76 | L |
| 5/22 | BALAVG | 3 | 8.10 | L |
| 5/17 | TORAVG | 6 | 6.00 | L |
| Date | Opp | IP | ERA | W/L |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6/6 | TEXAVG | 8 | 0.00 | W |
| 5/31 | BOSAVG | 6 | 4.50 | L |
| 5/25 | WSHHIGH | 3 | 21.00 | L |
| 5/20 | DETPOOR | 8 | 1.12 | W |
| 5/15 | CINAVG | 7 | 4.05 | L |
| vs RHP L10 | AVG3.99 | 5.8 R/G | 0.411 xwOBA |
| L10 overall | AVG3.87 | 6.3 R/G | 0.429 xwOBA |
| vs RHP L10 | AVG3.92 | 3.6 R/G | 0.365 xwOBA |
| L10 overall | AVG3.84 | 3.8 R/G | 0.382 xwOBA |
| Date | Starter | R | xwOBA |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6/11 | MatthewsRHPBLW | 11 | 0.377 |
| 6/10 | ParedesRHPPOOR | 4 | 0.477 |
| 6/9 | BradleyRHPAVG | 10 | 0.468 |
| 6/7 | CastilloRHPQAL | 5 | 0.364 |
| 6/6 | MillerRHPACE | 0 | 0.357 |
| Date | Starter | R | xwOBA |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6/10 | RodónLHPAVG | 4 | 0.451 |
| 6/9 | ColeRHPAVG | 2 | 0.391 |
| 6/8 | WarrenRHPBLW | 5 | -- |
| 6/7 | deGromRHPACE | 0 | 0.339 |
| 6/6 | LeiterRHPBLW | 6 | 0.418 |
Jack Leiter is showing concerning regression with a 9.57 ERA in his last start and elevated hard-hit rate (42.2%), while Sonny Gray has been more consistent with a superior 3.60 xFIP. Texas's offense has been volatile (0-10 runs range) but averages 4.7 R/G vs RHP; Boston's offense has cooled significantly in last 3 games (3.0 R/G) despite a stronger season average. Gray's control edge and Leiter's recent struggles favor the home team.
Sonny Gray (xFIP 3.60) holds a meaningful edge over Jack Leiter (xFIP 4.09), whose last start was a rough 5 ER in 4.7 IP and whose BB% of 10.3 is a concern. However, Boston's offense vs RHP has been poor lately (wOBA 0.257, L3 avg 3.0 R/G vs quality arms), and their home record is a dismal 10-21. Texas loses closer Jacob Latz and has two other arms limited, while Boston's bullpen is fully rested with a strong 3.28 xFIP, which is a significant late-game advantage for the home side.
TEX projects to score approximately 3.8-4.0 runs against Sonny Gray (xFIP 3.60, p25-equivalent elite, ~4.9 IP) and a rested BOS bullpen (xFIP 3.28, well below league RA/9 4.37); TEX offense is luck-inflated (wOBA 0.334 vs xwOBA 0.312, -0.022 gap) and on back-to-back. BOS projects to score approximately 3.4-3.6 runs against Jack Leiter (xFIP 4.09, near p50 average, ~5.6 IP) and a TEX bullpen with closer unavailable (Latz out) and two arms limited; BOS offense is cold (avg 3.0 last 5, wOBA 0.257 vs xwOBA 0.272, slightly suppressed) but faces a regression-candidate Leiter. Combined projection ~7.3-7.6 runs vs. posted total of 8.5. Sharp money is on TEX ML (money 76% vs bets 45%), BOS runline (money 95% vs bets 29%), and the under (money 92% vs bets 58%).
| Date | Opp | IP | ERA | W/L |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6/6 | CLEPOOR | 5 | 9.64 | L |
| 5/31 | KCPOOR | 6 | 0.00 | W |
| 5/26 | HOUPOOR | 6 | 6.00 | W |
| 5/20 | COLLOW | 5 | 7.20 | W |
| 5/15 | HOULOW | 7 | 1.29 | L |
| Date | Opp | IP | ERA | W/L |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6/5 | NYYHIGH | 6 | 4.26 | W |
| 5/30 | CLEAVG | 6 | 1.50 | W |
| 5/24 | MINAVG | 4 | 6.75 | L |
| 5/18 | KCLOW | 6 | 1.50 | W |
| 5/13 | PHIHIGH | 6 | 1.50 | W |
| vs RHP L10 | AVG4.06 | 4.7 R/G | 0.405 xwOBA |
| L10 overall | AVG4.03 | 4.4 R/G | 0.410 xwOBA |
| vs RHP L10 | AVG3.95 | 5.0 R/G | 0.399 xwOBA |
| L10 overall | AVG3.90 | 4.5 R/G | 0.394 xwOBA |
| Date | Starter | R | xwOBA |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6/11 | WachaRHPAVG | 4 | 0.345 |
| 6/10 | LugoRHPPOOR | 6 | 0.490 |
| 6/9 | KolekRHPAVG | 3 | 0.388 |
| 6/7 | CantilloLHPBLW | 10 | 0.471 |
| 6/6 | BibeeRHPAVG | 0 | 0.371 |
| Date | Starter | R | xwOBA |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6/10 | RasmussenRHPACE | 5 | 0.548 |
| 6/9 | MartinezRHPBLW | 3 | 0.304 |
| 6/8 | SeymourLHPBLW | 1 | -- |
| 6/7 | SchlittlerRHPACE | 1 | 0.361 |
| 6/5 | WeathersLHPQAL | 5 | 0.399 |
This matchup features two left-handed starters showing recent volatility, with Rodriguez appearing more stable than Lodolo. Arizona's offense has performed well against LHP historically but shows recent decline, while Cincinnati's offense is inconsistent and underperforming against lefties. The park factor is neutral, and weather conditions are favorable for hitting.
Eduardo Rodriguez has been solid over his last 30 days (xFIP 3.41, low BB%) and faces a Reds lineup that struggles vs LHP (wOBA .294, xwOBA .289). Nick Lodolo is trending in the wrong direction with a 5.08 xFIP, 9.6% walk rate, and a reverse platoon split that makes him vulnerable to the right-handed-heavy Arizona lineup. Both teams are in poor recent form, but the pitching matchup strongly favors Arizona.
ARI projects at approximately 4.2-4.4 runs: their offense averages 2.4 R/G last 5 games but xwOBA 0.371 vs wOBA 0.329 signals sustainable underlying contact quality, though schedule fatigue (back-to-back) and a recent cold spell vs LHP (3.0 R/G L3) temper the upside; Lodolo's xFIP 5.08 (above p75=4.79, weak) over ~5.4 IP is a significant run-prevention liability, with ERA 4.07 sitting 1.00 below xFIP indicating ERA deflation that may worsen. CIN projects at approximately 3.2-3.4 runs: Rodriguez's xFIP 3.41 (near p25=3.36, strong) over ~5.8 IP, improving trend, and low BB% 3.1% suppress run expectation materially; CIN's lineup vs LHP shows wOBA 0.294/xwOBA 0.289 with K% 31.0% (well above median 20.9%) and a cold contact label, though their L3 vs LHP averages 3.7 R/G against very strong pitching (avg xFIP 2.96). Combined estimate ~7.4-7.8 runs against a posted total of 9.5 suggests the under, with sharp money annotations also pointing toward the over on totals and away on runline providing a cross-check. ARI ML is a marginal edge given Lodolo's ERA/xFIP divergence not fully reflected in near-coin-flip pricing.
| Date | Opp | IP | ERA | W/L |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6/6 | WSHHIGH | 6 | 5.68 | L |
| 6/1 | LADELIT | 6 | 1.50 | W |
| 5/26 | SFAVG | 6 | 3.00 | W |
| 5/21 | COLAVG | 7 | 0.00 | W |
| 5/16 | COLAVG | 5 | 5.06 | L |
| Date | Opp | IP | ERA | W/L |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6/6 | STLLOW | 5 | 7.20 | L |
| 5/31 | ATLHIGH | 7 | 4.05 | W |
| 5/25 | NYMAVG | 6 | 1.50 | W |
| 5/18 | PHIHIGH | 6 | 4.76 | L |
| 5/13 | WSHHIGH | 4 | 11.25 | L |
| vs LHP L7 | BLW4.33 | 6.1 R/G | 0.425 xwOBA |
| L10 overall | AVG3.93 | 2.5 R/G | 0.391 xwOBA |
| vs LHP L8 | QAL3.44 | 5.5 R/G | 0.440 xwOBA |
| L10 overall | AVG4.09 | 3.6 R/G | 0.413 xwOBA |
| Date | Starter | R | xwOBA |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6/11 | PhillipsRHPPOOR | 0 | 0.376 |
| 6/10 | GustoRHPACE | 0 | 0.297 |
| 6/9 | MeyerRHPAVG | 6 | 0.491 |
| 6/7 | CavalliRHPQAL | 5 | 0.516 |
| 6/6 | LittellRHPBLW | 1 | 0.355 |
| Date | Starter | R | xwOBA |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6/10 | KingRHPAVG | 4 | 0.429 |
| 6/9 | GiolitoRHPPOOR | 5 | 0.406 |
| 6/8 | BuehlerRHPAVG | 2 | -- |
| 6/7 | McGreevyRHPBLW | 3 | 0.364 |
| 6/6 | LiberatoreLHPACE | 5 | 0.353 |
Strider shows concerning consistency with a 5.40 ERA over his last three starts despite solid peripherals (3.77 xFIP), while McLean is trending upward with back-to-back quality starts after a rough outing. The Braves' offense has been inconsistent against RHP (4.3 R/G average but just 1 R in their last game), while the Mets have cooled significantly in their last 3 games (2.3 R/G vs 4.6 prior). This matchup projects to be a low-scoring affair with modest run production from both sides.
Atlanta enters as a heavy favorite with a 42-21 record and Spencer Strider on the mound against a struggling Mets squad (27-36) starting Nolan McLean, whose xFIP of 5.10 signals significant regression risk despite two recent solid outings. Strider's recent results show consistent 5 IP/3 ER lines, but his underlying metrics (xFIP 3.77, K% 27.6) are solid, and he faces a lineup heavy with left-handed bats where his wOBA allowed is elevated (0.389 actual vs 0.304 xwOBA). The hot weather (94F) and left-to-right wind add roughly +0.37 runs to the total, and the NYM bullpen is significantly compromised with Williams, Weaver, Raley, and Minter all unavailable after pitching yesterday.
ATL projects to score approximately 4.3-4.5 runs facing McLean (xFIP 5.10, p75-weak, ~5.3 IP) and a NYM bullpen with key arms depleted (Williams, Weaver, Raley, Minter all pitched yesterday, avg xFIP 4.16 for available arms vs league 4.37). NYM projects to score approximately 3.0-3.3 runs facing Strider (xFIP 3.77, p25-strong range, ERA 5.40 inflated above xFIP by +1.63, ~4.9 IP) backed by an elite ATL bullpen (avg xFIP 3.30 vs league 4.37). Combined estimate ~7.4-7.8 runs vs posted line of 8.5, suggesting slight under lean, though weather (+0.4 runs, 94F, wind L-to-R) closes the gap. Sharp money is heavily on ATL ML (-99pp money vs bets), ATL runline (-53pp), and the over (-25pp), with the ML line moving from -115 to -105 toward NYM despite the sharp-money flow favoring ATL.
| Date | Opp | IP | ERA | W/L |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6/6 | PITELIT | 5 | 5.40 | W |
| 5/31 | CINHIGH | 5 | 5.40 | L |
| 5/26 | BOSPOOR | 5 | 5.40 | W |
| 5/21 | MIAHIGH | 6 | 4.26 | W |
| 5/15 | BOSPOOR | 5 | 1.69 | W |
| Date | Opp | IP | ERA | W/L |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6/6 | SDPOOR | 6 | 1.50 | L |
| 5/31 | MIAAVG | 5 | 1.80 | W |
| 5/25 | CINHIGH | 3 | 18.90 | L |
| 5/19 | WSHELIT | 6 | 9.53 | L |
| 5/14 | DETLOW | 7 | 3.86 | W |
| vs RHP L10 | AVG3.88 | 4.8 R/G | 0.386 xwOBA |
| L10 overall | AVG3.84 | 4.3 R/G | 0.398 xwOBA |
| vs RHP L10 | QAL3.59 | 3.9 R/G | 0.436 xwOBA |
| L10 overall | QAL3.59 | 4.3 R/G | 0.449 xwOBA |
| Date | Starter | R | xwOBA |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6/10 | MartinRHPQAL | 1 | 0.408 |
| 6/9 | EisertLHPAVG | 5 | 0.393 |
| 6/7 | MontgomeryLHPACE | 3 | 0.386 |
| 6/6 | AshcraftRHPACE | 6 | 0.397 |
| 6/5 | KellerRHPBLW | 6 | 0.451 |
| Date | Starter | R | xwOBA |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6/11 | DobbinsRHPACE | 5 | 0.444 |
| 6/10 | PallanteRHPQAL | 2 | 0.388 |
| 6/9 | MayRHPACE | 0 | 0.352 |
| 6/7 | VásquezRHPBLW | 7 | 0.543 |
| 6/6 | CanningRHPAVG | 2 | 0.388 |
| Date | Opp | IP | ERA | W/L |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6/5 | BOSHIGH | 6 | 7.50 | L |
| 5/30 | ATHLOW | 7 | 6.75 | L |
| 5/24 | TBELIT | 7 | 0.00 | W |
| 5/18 | TORAVG | 5 | 8.44 | W |
| 5/11 | BALAVG | 6 | 2.84 | L |
| L10 overall | QAL3.60 | 5.4 R/G | 0.406 xwOBA |
| vs LHP L7 | QAL3.44 | 4.7 R/G | 0.399 xwOBA |
| L10 overall | QAL3.61 | 4.2 R/G | 0.396 xwOBA |
| Date | Starter | R | xwOBA |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6/10 | MessickLHPAVG | 8 | 0.356 |
| 6/9 | CecconiRHPQAL | 3 | 0.480 |
| 6/8 | WilliamsRHPACE | 7 | -- |
| 6/7 | SuarezLHPACE | 6 | 0.510 |
| 6/5 | GrayRHPQAL | 3 | 0.364 |
| Date | Starter | R | xwOBA |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6/10 | LuzardoLHPAVG | 4 | 0.421 |
| 6/9 | WheelerRHPQAL | 3 | 0.346 |
| 6/8 | SánchezLHPACE | 2 | -- |
| 6/7 | BazRHPBLW | 6 | 0.476 |
| 6/6 | BradishRHPAVG | 6 | 0.340 |
Roki Sasaki's elite peripherals (2.21 xFIP, 31.4 K%) face a White Sox offense that has been inconsistent against quality RHP, while Anthony Kay is showing clear regression after a disastrous last outing (13.50 ERA). The Dodgers' recent struggles against LHP are concerning, but Sasaki's dominance should suppress Chicago's run production.
Roki Sasaki has been excellent over his last 30 days (xFIP 2.21, K% 31.4) and faces a Dodgers offense that has gone ice-cold against lefties recently (1.7 R/G in last 3 vs LHP), though Kay throws left so that split is relevant context. Anthony Kay's underlying metrics are concerning (xFIP 4.79, BB% 8.5) and he was shelled for 6 ER in his last start, while the Dodgers have a strong road record (22-13). The LAD bullpen is heavily taxed with only 3/8 arms rested and key relievers limited, which tempers the margin of victory outlook.
LAD projects for approximately 5.2-5.8 runs: their last-5 avg of 8.4 is materially inflated by luck (wOBA 0.260 vs xwOBA 0.274 vs LHP, and L3 vs LHP avg just 1.7 R/G vs starters with avg xFIP 3.39 — notably poor recent LHP production), but Kay's xFIP of 4.79 (p75, weak) over ~5.2 IP and a fully rested CWS bullpen with avg xFIP 4.52 (near league RA/9 4.37) keep a moderate run floor. CWS projects for approximately 1.8-2.4 runs: Sasaki's 30-day xFIP of 2.21 (well below p25=3.36, elite) over ~6.1 IP is the dominant suppression factor, CWS wOBA 0.330 vs xwOBA 0.293 signals luck-driven contact due to regress, and LAD's bullpen is significantly taxed with three arms limited and two unavailable. The combined estimate of roughly 7.0-8.2 runs sits below the posted 8.5 total. Sharp money is notably present on the LAD runline (money 95% vs bets 31%, +64pp gap) and on the under (money 99% vs bets 42%, +57pp gap).
| Date | Opp | IP | ERA | W/L |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5/30 | PHILOW | 5 | 1.69 | L |
| 5/23 | MILAVG | 5 | 3.60 | W |
| 5/17 | LAAPOOR | 7 | 1.29 | W |
| 5/12 | SFPOOR | 5 | 5.40 | L |
| 5/2 | STLELIT | 6 | 4.50 | L |
| Date | Opp | IP | ERA | W/L |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6/5 | PHIPOOR | 4 | 13.50 | L |
| 5/30 | DETPOOR | 5 | 1.80 | W |
| 5/25 | MINAVG | 6 | 1.50 | W |
| 5/19 | SEAAVG | 5 | 1.69 | W |
| 5/14 | KCAVG | 6 | 3.00 | W |
| vs LHP L6 | BLW4.24 | 5.8 R/G | 0.416 xwOBA |
| L10 overall | BLW4.22 | 5.9 R/G | 0.437 xwOBA |
| vs RHP L10 | AVG4.12 | 4.9 R/G | 0.400 xwOBA |
| L10 overall | AVG4.03 | 5.2 R/G | 0.419 xwOBA |
| Date | Starter | R | xwOBA |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6/11 | KellerRHPPOOR | 8 | 0.459 |
| 6/10 | JonesRHPAVG | 8 | 0.514 |
| 6/9 | SkenesRHPACE | 12 | 0.524 |
| 6/7 | SorianoRHPBLW | 5 | 0.387 |
| 6/6 | KochanowiczRHPPOOR | 9 | 0.437 |
| Date | Starter | R | xwOBA |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6/10 | SaleLHPACE | 2 | 0.409 |
| 6/9 | HolmesRHPAVG | 6 | 0.432 |
| 6/7 | NolaRHPBLW | 5 | 0.407 |
| 6/6 | PainterRHPPOOR | 6 | 0.379 |
| 6/5 | LuzardoLHPAVG | 6 | 0.425 |
Misiorowski is in elite form (2.22 xFIP, 36% K-rate) and has allowed just 1 ER over his last 3 starts, while Painter is deteriorating badly with a 5.03 xFIP and 11+ ERA over his last two outings. The Brewers' offense (8.4 R/G, 0.417 wOBA vs RHP) significantly outmatches the Phillies' anemic production (4.7 R/G, 0.333 wOBA vs RHP), creating a clear mismatch favoring Milwaukee.
Jacob Misiorowski is in historically dominant form (3 straight 7-IP starts, 0-1 ER each, xFIP 2.22, 36% K rate) and faces a PHI offense averaging just 3.6 R/G vs RHP over the last 10 games. Andrew Painter has been shelled in his last two starts (combined 8 ER in 8 IP, xFIP 5.03) and faces a red-hot MIL offense averaging 8.4 R/G over the last 10 games with a .417 wOBA vs RHP. MIL's bullpen is fully stocked and the home team holds a clear edge in nearly every dimension of this matchup.
MIL projects ~4.8 runs (xwOBA 0.379 vs RHP, partial luck adjustment from wOBA 0.417 gap, facing Painter's xFIP 5.03 over ~4.7 IP then PHI's elite bullpen xFIP 3.06 for ~4.3 IP); PHI projects ~1.8 runs (xwOBA 0.319 vs RHP, avg 3.6 R/G last 10 vs RHP, facing Misiorowski's elite xFIP 2.22 over ~6.7 IP then MIL's weak bullpen xFIP 4.77 for ~2.3 IP). Combined estimate ~6.6 runs vs posted line of 7.5. Sharp money moved the total from 8.0 to 7.5 with 93% of dollars on Under, confirming the under-side read. MIL ML at 68.5% implied appears fairly priced given the elite starter but PHI's bullpen advantage and Misiorowski's ERA/xFIP regression risk create a ceiling question on the margin.
| Date | Opp | IP | ERA | W/L |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6/6 | CWSELIT | 5 | 11.57 | L |
| 5/31 | LADELIT | 3 | 10.80 | L |
| 5/24 | CLEAVG | 6 | 2.84 | L |
| 5/18 | CINAVG | 6 | 3.00 | W |
| 5/13 | BOSAVG | 5 | 1.80 | L |
| Date | Opp | IP | ERA | W/L |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6/6 | COLHIGH | 7 | 0.00 | W |
| 5/31 | HOUAVG | 7 | 0.00 | W |
| 5/25 | STLLOW | 7 | 1.29 | W |
| 5/19 | CHCAVG | 6 | 0.00 | W |
| 5/13 | SDLOW | 7 | 0.00 | L |
| vs RHP L10 | AVG4.09 | 3.6 R/G | 0.430 xwOBA |
| L10 overall | AVG4.11 | 4.7 R/G | 0.453 xwOBA |
| vs RHP L10 | BLW4.23 | 6.1 R/G | 0.396 xwOBA |
| L10 overall | BLW4.23 | 8.4 R/G | 0.416 xwOBA |
| Date | Starter | R | xwOBA |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6/10 | ScherzerRHPPOOR | 7 | 0.410 |
| 6/9 | CeaseRHPACE | 2 | 0.341 |
| 6/8 | CorbinLHPBLW | 5 | -- |
| 6/7 | GilbertLHP-- | 9 | 0.586 |
| 6/6 | EisertLHPQAL | 3 | 0.444 |
| Date | Starter | R | xwOBA |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6/10 | PerkinsRHPBLW | 3 | 0.317 |
| 6/9 | GinnRHPQAL | 5 | 0.393 |
| 6/8 | SpringsLHPBLW | 15 | -- |
| 6/7 | FreelandLHPPOOR | 12 | 0.508 |
| 6/6 | AgnosRHPPOOR | 7 | 0.509 |
Houston's offense has been volatile but shows recent strength (6.3 R/G last 3 games vs RHP), while Kansas City's offense is more consistent but slightly cooler (3.3 R/G last 3 games). Imai's recent form is solid with declining ERA trend, while Avila shows volatility with a concerning 17.9% BB rate despite recent success. The matchup favors Houston's offense against Avila's elevated walk rate.
Two struggling teams meet in Kansas City, with HOU (27-37) and KC (26-39) both below .500. Imai has been solid recently with a 3.60 ERA trend and dominant splits vs RHB, while Avila's last two starts show improvement but his 17.9% BB rate and small sample make him volatile. KC's offense carries a strong wOBA vs RHP (.383) but has cooled in the last 3 games (3.3 R/G), while HOU's offense is wildly inconsistent with extreme variance in recent scoring.
HOU projects to ~4.3 runs against Avila (xFIP 4.43, p75-weak, projected only ~3.3 IP handing ~5.7 IP to KC bullpen xFIP 3.96) and KC projects to ~3.6 runs against Imai (xFIP 4.03, p50-avg, projected ~5.2 IP, with Imai's ERA 2.12 being significantly deflated vs xFIP 4.03). Combined estimate ~7.9 runs vs posted O/U 9.5, pointing toward under. Sharp money is clearly on KC ML (57% of money, 29% of bets, +28pp gap, line moved KC from +100 to -103), a signal worth crediting but not decisive on its own.
| Date | Opp | IP | ERA | W/L |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6/6 | ATHLOW | 5 | 3.60 | W |
| 5/31 | MILAVG | 6 | 3.00 | L |
| 5/25 | TEXAVG | 6 | 0.00 | W |
| 5/18 | MINAVG | 5 | 5.79 | L |
| 5/13 | SEALOW | 4 | 13.50 | L |
| Date | Opp | IP | ERA | W/L |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6/6 | MINAVG | 5 | 1.80 | W |
| 6/1 | CINHIGH | 5 | 1.80 | W |
| 4/4 | MILHIGH | 3 | 15.00 | L |
| vs RHP L10 | AVG4.05 | 5.5 R/G | 0.387 xwOBA |
| L10 overall | QAL3.80 | 4.4 R/G | 0.388 xwOBA |
| vs RHP L10 | QAL3.63 | 4.4 R/G | 0.424 xwOBA |
| L10 overall | AVG3.84 | 4.8 R/G | 0.435 xwOBA |
| Date | Starter | R | xwOBA |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6/10 | DetmersLHPACE | 2 | 0.435 |
| 6/9 | UreñaRHPBLW | 1 | 0.342 |
| 6/8 | RodriguezRHPPOOR | 5 | -- |
| 6/7 | JumpLHPBLW | 0 | 0.362 |
| 6/6 | MorrisRHPPOOR | 13 | 0.344 |
| Date | Starter | R | xwOBA |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6/11 | RockerRHPQAL | 2 | 0.435 |
| 6/10 | GoreLHPAVG | 4 | 0.464 |
| 6/9 | EovaldiRHPAVG | 5 | 0.490 |
| 6/7 | PrielippLHPQAL | 6 | 0.534 |
| 6/6 | RyanRHPACE | 3 | 0.301 |
Joe Ryan's elite 2.87 xFIP and 30.6 K% significantly outclass Kyle Leahy's 4.85 xFIP and inconsistent recent form. The Cardinals' offense has been volatile (1-10 runs per game) and struggles against quality pitching, while the Twins' recent offensive slump (2.0 R/G last 3 games) may be temporary given their stronger underlying metrics. Ryan's dominance should suppress St. Louis scoring, but Leahy's volatility and high hard-hit rate (46%) could allow Minnesota to score enough for a close game.
Joe Ryan is the clear pitching advantage here with an elite xFIP of 2.87, 30.6% K rate, and 3.1% BB rate over the last 30 days, facing a Cardinals lineup that went ice-cold against quality RHP (1 R in 4 straight games vs RHP with xFIP under 3.8 before their recent hot stretch). Kyle Leahy has been inconsistent and concerning, with a 46% hard-hit rate and poor xFIP of 4.85, while the Twins offense has cooled significantly (2.0 R/G in last 3 games). STL's 6-1 recent form and hot offense (5.6 R/G last 10) creates tension, but Ryan's dominance and the Twins' home field edge the needle toward Minnesota.
STL projects for approximately 3.6-3.9 runs: their wOBA 0.348 vs xwOBA 0.305 gap (-0.043) signals luck-driven recent production due to regress against Joe Ryan's elite xFIP 2.87 (p25 or better, well above average) over ~5.9 IP, with MIN's bullpen at xFIP 4.26 (slightly above league RA/9 4.37) covering the remaining innings; STL's back-to-back fatigue and K% 27.0 vs Ryan's elite profile further suppresses their ceiling. MIN projects for approximately 3.8-4.2 runs: Leahy's xFIP 4.85 (near p75, weak) over only ~4.9 IP with ERA 6.09 inflated above xFIP but HardHit% 46.0 (well above 39.5 median) suggesting genuine hard contact, handing innings to STL's bullpen (avg xFIP 3.21, well below league RA/9 4.37, a genuine strength); MIN's offense is cold (3.4 avg last 5, xwOBA 0.313 vs wOBA 0.336 slight luck-driven) and back-to-back. Combined estimate ~7.5-8.1 runs vs 8.5 posted line, with +0.4 wind adjustment pushing it toward 7.9-8.5; sharp money is clearly on MIN ML (-46pp spread) and the under (100% of money), both aligned with this analysis.
| Date | Opp | IP | ERA | W/L |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6/5 | CINAVG | 4 | 6.75 | W |
| 5/30 | CHCLOW | 4 | 2.08 | L |
| 5/23 | CINHIGH | 5 | 9.00 | L |
| 5/16 | KCAVG | 6 | 1.50 | W |
| 5/10 | SDAVG | 5 | 0.00 | L |
| Date | Opp | IP | ERA | W/L |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6/6 | KCLOW | 6 | 1.50 | L |
| 6/1 | CWSHIGH | 6 | 6.00 | W |
| 5/26 | CWSHIGH | 8 | 2.35 | W |
| 5/20 | HOUPOOR | 6 | 1.50 | W |
| 5/15 | MILHIGH | 6 | 1.50 | L |
| vs RHP L10 | QAL3.79 | 4.3 R/G | 0.419 xwOBA |
| L10 overall | BLW4.22 | 5.6 R/G | 0.419 xwOBA |
| vs RHP L10 | AVG4.15 | 4.4 R/G | 0.376 xwOBA |
| L10 overall | BLW4.31 | 4.3 R/G | 0.389 xwOBA |
| Date | Starter | R | xwOBA |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6/11 | ScottRHPAVG | 4 | 0.479 |
| 6/10 | WarrenRHPBLW | 9 | 0.473 |
| 6/9 | PeraltaRHPAVG | 7 | 0.386 |
| 6/7 | LowderRHPPOOR | 5 | 0.412 |
| 6/6 | LodoloLHPPOOR | 6 | 0.433 |
| Date | Starter | R | xwOBA |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6/11 | MonteroRHPPOOR | 0 | 0.304 |
| 6/10 | ValdezLHPPOOR | 6 | 0.413 |
| 6/9 | MeltonRHPBLW | 4 | 0.376 |
| 6/7 | CameronLHPACE | 5 | 0.355 |
| 6/6 | AvilaRHPAVG | 2 | 0.352 |
McClanahan shows concerning regression after a dominant start (7.20 ERA last outing), while Aldegheri has limited recent data but comparable xFIP. Tampa Bay's offense averages 5.2 R/G vs LHP but faces a pitcher with solid peripherals; Los Angeles struggles significantly vs LHP (3.4 R/G average) and scored just 2 runs against McClanahan on 5/31. This matchup favors Tampa Bay's superior offensive performance against left-handed pitching.
Tampa Bay enters as a strong favorite with a 38-22 record against a struggling 24-39 Angels squad. McClanahan's last start was rough (4 ER in 5 IP) but his 30-day xFIP of 4.23 suggests he's still a quality arm, while Aldegheri is a relatively inexperienced starter with limited data. The Rays' offense has been productive against LHP (5.2 R/G over last 10 such games), while the Angels have been weak vs LHP (3.4 R/G, wOBA .295), making this a lopsided matchup on paper.
TB projects to score approximately 3.2–3.5 runs against Aldegheri (xFIP 4.05, ~avg, 5.3 IP projected) and LAA bullpen (xFIP 4.43, above league RA/9 4.37), but TB's offense vs LHP shows wOBA 0.366 vs xwOBA 0.278 — a large -0.088 luck gap signaling significant regression incoming; park-neutral recent avg is 3.57 but xwOBA-adjusted expectation is materially lower, call it ~3.2. LAA projects to score approximately 2.8–3.0 runs against McClanahan (ERA 2.94 vs xFIP 4.23, ERA deflated and likely to worsen; xFIP trend declining 3.82→4.23; ~4.9 IP projected) and TB bullpen (xFIP 4.30, near league avg), with LAA vs LHP recent avg only 3.4 R/G and xwOBA 0.372 against soft opposition, but their 15d wOBA 0.295 vs xwOBA 0.328 shows slight positive luck gap (sustainable). Combined estimate ~6.0–6.5 runs vs the posted total of 8.5, suggesting meaningful under pressure. Market has TB at -172 (60.7% implied), which is broadly consistent with the pitching edges TB holds, though McClanahan's ERA deflation relative to his rising xFIP is a modest counter-signal.
| Date | Opp | IP | ERA | W/L |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6/6 | MIALOW | 5 | 7.20 | L |
| 5/31 | LAAAVG | 5 | 1.80 | W |
| 5/25 | BALLOW | 5 | 0.00 | L |
| 5/18 | BALLOW | 5 | 7.20 | W |
| 5/12 | TORAVG | 5 | 0.00 | W |
| Date | Opp | IP | ERA | W/L |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5/6 | CWSELIT | 4 | 4.50 | W |
| vs LHP L10 | AVG3.89 | 5.2 R/G | 0.343 xwOBA |
| L10 overall | QAL3.74 | 4.0 R/G | 0.398 xwOBA |
| vs LHP L7 | BLW4.29 | 3.4 R/G | 0.372 xwOBA |
| L10 overall | BLW4.23 | 5.5 R/G | 0.397 xwOBA |
| Date | Starter | R | xwOBA |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6/10 | BennettLHPAVG | 7 | 0.328 |
| 6/9 | TolleLHPQAL | 4 | 0.376 |
| 6/8 | EarlyLHPQAL | 3 | -- |
| 6/7 | AlcantaraRHPQAL | 1 | 0.447 |
| 6/6 | BacharRHPQAL | 3 | 0.421 |
| Date | Starter | R | xwOBA |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6/10 | LambertRHPBLW | 3 | 0.335 |
| 6/9 | TengRHPBLW | 10 | 0.399 |
| 6/8 | ArrighettiRHPPOOR | 4 | -- |
| 6/7 | SheehanRHPBLW | 13 | 0.505 |
| 6/6 | YamamotoRHPACE | 2 | 0.311 |
| Date | Opp | IP | ERA | W/L |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6/7 | HOUELIT | 6 | 0.00 | W |
| 6/2 | CHCLOW | 7 | 1.29 | W |
| 5/26 | SEAAVG | 5 | 7.20 | L |
| vs LHP L9 | AVG4.17 | 3.7 R/G | 0.350 xwOBA |
| L10 overall | BLW4.28 | 5.2 R/G | 0.434 xwOBA |
| L10 overall | BLW4.34 | 5.4 R/G | 0.425 xwOBA |
| Date | Starter | R | xwOBA |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6/11 | CabreraRHPBLW | 3 | 0.518 |
| 6/10 | ImanagaLHPBLW | 3 | 0.355 |
| 6/9 | ReaRHPPOOR | 7 | 0.485 |
| 6/7 | DrohanLHPACE | 4 | 0.365 |
| 6/6 | MisiorowskiRHPACE | 1 | 0.358 |
| Date | Starter | R | xwOBA |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6/10 | SproatRHPAVG | 4 | 0.427 |
| 6/9 | GasserLHPPOOR | 7 | 0.380 |
| 6/8 | HarrisonLHPACE | 14 | -- |
| 6/7 | BurrowsRHPPOOR | 5 | 0.375 |
| 6/6 | ImaiRHPBLW | 2 | 0.402 |
The Giants' offense has been significantly more productive than the Cubs' lately, averaging 7.0 R/G vs RHP compared to Chicago's 3.4 overall. Assad shows volatility (18.84 ERA in one recent start) while Roupp has stabilized with a strong last outing, though both pitchers carry elevated hard-hit rates suggesting offensive vulnerability. Oracle Park's neutral run factor (0.97) and cool weather (60F) provide modest headwinds for run production.
The Cubs enter as favorites despite a struggling offense (3.4 R/G last 10, cold L3 games) facing a Giants team that has been volatile but averaging 5.7 R/G last 10 with massive blowup games. Assad has been inconsistent with a brutal 9-ER outing sandwiched between solid starts, while Roupp's xFIP of 3.75 looks better than his raw results suggest. The Giants' fully rested bullpen (13/13) is a significant advantage over the Cubs' depleted pen, and SF's home offense vs RHP has been dangerous despite the overall poor season record.
CHC projects to score approximately 3.2–3.6 runs: recent avg 3.6/game (last 5), but wOBA 0.338 vs xwOBA 0.317 flags a luck-driven gap of +0.021 that warrants modest regression, facing Roupp (xFIP 3.75, p25-p50 range, strong-to-avg) for ~4.9 IP, then a very weak SF bullpen (avg xFIP 4.78, above league RA/9 4.37) for ~4.1 IP. SF projects to score approximately 3.0–3.4 runs: recent avg 4.2/game (last 5) but wOBA 0.435 vs xwOBA 0.362 shows a massive +0.073 luck-driven gap — the largest contact-luck flag in this game — facing Assad (xFIP 4.16, near p50, average) for only ~3.8 IP, then a strong CHC bullpen (avg xFIP 3.74, well below league RA/9). Combined estimate of roughly 6.2–7.0 runs sits below the posted 7.5 total. The market prices this as a near coin-flip (49.7%/50.3%), which the run estimates broadly support with a slight lean to CHC driven by bullpen quality differential.
| Date | Opp | IP | ERA | W/L |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4/19 | NYMPOOR | 6 | 1.59 | W |
| 4/13 | PHILOW | 4 | 18.69 | L |
| 4/7 | TBAVG | 6 | 0.00 | W |
| Date | Opp | IP | ERA | W/L |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6/6 | CHCLOW | 6 | 1.59 | L |
| 6/1 | MILLOW | 4 | 18.00 | L |
| 5/25 | ARIHIGH | 5 | 3.60 | L |
| 5/19 | ARIAVG | 6 | 1.50 | L |
| 5/14 | LADLOW | 5 | 6.75 | L |
| vs RHP L10 | AVG3.93 | 5.3 R/G | 0.416 xwOBA |
| L10 overall | AVG4.02 | 3.4 R/G | 0.403 xwOBA |
| vs RHP L10 | AVG3.87 | 7.0 R/G | 0.399 xwOBA |
| L10 overall | AVG3.98 | 5.7 R/G | 0.412 xwOBA |
| Date | Starter | R | xwOBA |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6/11 | FeltnerRHPPOOR | 9 | 0.518 |
| 6/10 | LorenzenRHPAVG | 2 | 0.341 |
| 6/9 | SuganoRHPPOOR | 3 | 0.382 |
| 6/7 | McDonaldRHPQAL | 1 | 0.339 |
| 6/6 | RouppRHPQAL | 3 | 0.449 |
| Date | Starter | R | xwOBA |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6/10 | GriffinLHPQAL | 11 | 0.457 |
| 6/9 | AlvarezLHPQAL | 3 | 0.383 |
| 6/8 | LoveladyLHPPOOR | 3 | -- |
| 6/7 | TaillonRHPBLW | 2 | 0.326 |
| 6/6 | BrownRHPACE | 2 | 0.370 |